03/28/2022 / By Ethan Huff
After being relentlessly blasted as “Russian disinformation,” the New York Post‘s bombshell story about the contents of Hunter Biden’s laptop has now been vindicated by The New York Times as true. This has not stopped the “fact-checkers,” however, from continuing to rank the Post‘s coverage low on its accuracy scale.
The Times‘s admission, meanwhile, caught many off guard. It affirms that Hunter and his dad, Joe, engaged in overseas influence-peddling schemes, not only in China but also in Russia and Ukraine.
The Federalist‘s Tristan Justice wrote a piece about how there is still a concerted effort to keep a lid on the Hunter Biden laptop scandal, as well as other scandals that shine a light on the dirty deeds of the ruling elite.
Certain “news groups,” he says, that are “dedicated to discrediting misinformation” actually “have a history of amplifying” it. Various media outlets that still claim the Hunter Biden laptop scandal to be fake, for instance, continue to have high rankings for accuracy on NewsGuard, a prominent “fact-checking” organization.
“Nearly every outlet that opted to ignore or discredit the Post‘s reporting maintains a near-perfect rating from NewsGuard’s accuracy and credibility score,” Justice writes, naming Politico, NPR, and the Times as holding “a favorable 100 / 100 rating while CBS scores a 95 / 100.”
The Post‘s original piece exposing Hunter Biden and his laptop, meanwhile, holds a 69.5 / 100 rating at NewsGuard, the suggestion being that it contains false information.
You will recall that the Post broke the story at a critical juncture in our nation’s trajectory. It was released just before the 2020 election, the hope being that Americans would see that the Biden crime family has no business occupying the White House.
Strings were pulled and ballots were changed, however, and we ended up with Biden anyway. And now, finally, the truth is coming out that Hunter’s laptop is, in fact, filled with damning revelations about him and his family’s criminal activities around the world.
“The story was heavily censored and dismissed by social media platforms and mainstream outlets, and 50 former U.S. intelligence officers claimed the laptop was probably false information put forward by Russian propagandists,” explains Ashley Sadler for LifeSiteNews. “Twitter drew massive backlash when it locked the Post’s account following the publication of the story.”
“Many believe the throttling of the politically damning story, which suggests that Hunter Biden leveraged his father’s political influence for profit, unfairly tilted the 2020 election in favor of Joe Biden.”
Perhaps it is not too late to see justice prevail in all this. Every day, it seems like something new and big gets revealed, oftentimes by a big-name player like the Times. The result is that more people get awakened to the dark and ugly truth about our nation’s leaders, including those currently occupying the White House.
“If the Bidens live long enough to squeal, thousands of people will be going to jail,” wrote someone at Natural News about a year ago, speculating as to what could eventually happen if the ball really got rolling.
“Remember when Trump made the phone call to the Ukraine president and all hell broke out?” wrote another. “Read the transcript of that call and you’ll see that Trump was trying to find out about Hunter’s illegal business dealings over there.”
“It really looks like things are about to hit the fan!”
Another took a more cynical approach, suggesting that laws only apply to the general public, not to “elitists” like the Bidens.
More related news about the sham of “fact checking” can be found at Propaganda.news.
Sources for this article include:
Tagged Under:
Censorship, fact checkers, fake news, high ranking, Hunter Biden, influence peddling, Journalism, lies, New York Post, newsguard, propaganda, rigged, russian disinformation, times
This article may contain statements that reflect the opinion of the author
COPYRIGHT © 2017 FREEPRESS.NEWS
All content posted on this site is protected under Free Speech. FreePress.news is not responsible for content written by contributing authors. The information on this site is provided for educational and entertainment purposes only. It is not intended as a substitute for professional advice of any kind. FreePress.news assumes no responsibility for the use or misuse of this material. All trademarks, registered trademarks and service marks mentioned on this site are the property of their respective owners.